see this summary of a video:
"The video features Stephen CuUnjieng, a former global investment banker and independent director at the Maharlika Investment Corp., discussing the challenges faced by the Philippine stock market, particularly its lack of liquidity, and offering solutions based on systems used in other markets.
CuUnjieng expresses frustration with the Philippine stock market, noting that its index and share prices are at the same level as 12 to 13 years ago, effectively having moved backwards (9:51 - 10:28). He attributes this underperformance partly to the setup of the country's capital markets for equities and partly to structural issues within the country (10:06 - 10:11). He points out that globally, the most popular industries that grew last year were tech and manufacturing, whereas the Philippines tends to focus on "boring" sectors like real estate, malls, and infrastructure (10:30 - 10:44). Without locally owned tech or significant manufacturing outside of food, the Philippine market struggles to perform in line with regional peers (10:47 - 11:03).
A core issue, according to CuUnjieng, is the lack of liquidity in the Philippine market (11:22 - 11:31). He states that small cap stocks become "even smaller" because there is no liquidity (11:25 - 11:31). He suggests that fixing this is "easy" by looking at other markets (11:35 - 11:37).
He then details the specialist system used in the New York Stock Exchange:
Role of a Specialist: A specialist takes inventory of the stock they specialize in. When a company lists on the NYSE, specialists must be approved and bid for (11:46 - 12:19). Ensuring Liquidity: The primary function of a specialist is to ensure there is always an offer to buy and an offer to sell (12:23 - 12:27). This creates perpetual liquidity, meaning that a trade can always occur, even if the price, spread, or volume might not be ideal for the transacting parties (12:27 - 12:41).
Capital Provision: The specialist provides capital by continuously maintaining an inventory of the stock (15:52 - 15:54). Proportional Liquidity: While a 100 million market cap company won't have 100 million worth of liquidity, there is proportional liquidity for listed stocks (12:54 - 13:09).
Obligation for Listed Companies: The speaker suggests making it an obligation for listed companies to follow a system akin to the NYSE, to avoid "phantom stocks" that are listed but not traded (13:29 - 13:41).
CuUnjieng contrasts this with the Philippine market, where once you go beyond the top 10 or 20 stocks, everything "trades by appointment," meaning one has to find out if there's stock for sale or if someone will buy it, indicating a lack of liquidity (17:46 - 17:51). He highlights the problematic situation of stocks being suspended from trading for years, preventing them from being truly on or off the market (18:05 - 18:18).
He also briefly mentions market makers in the NASDAQ system, noting that while NASDAQ doesn't have specialists, most major and even mid-sized NASDAQ stocks have appointed market makers to provide a level of organized trading. This system is not as formal as a specialist system, but it serves a similar purpose (17:03 - 17:18).
The speaker concludes that the poor liquidity in the Philippine stock market is a significant problem, with less than 40% of trading being by Philippine retail investors, unlike other frontier markets like Vietnam, Thailand, and Malaysia where the majority of trading is done by local institutions and individuals (14:14 - 14:39). This poor liquidity discourages investment because even in small stocks, investors need to know they can sell if they change their minds (14:47 - 14:53). He insists that solutions, like adopting a specialist or market maker system, are available and already in use elsewhere (16:24 - 16:26)."
[and I added this, what I actually want to know] discuss how the specialists or market makers actually work at the NYSE and Nasdaq in his examples. how does that actually work in the real world? esp when there is too much demand and the specialist's inventory runs down, or when sentiment goes very bad and the specialist's inventory goes very high and the price goes very low? does the specialist keep buying when demand is too low? in the normal case, that can easily work. but how does it work at the edges? very high prices might be very risky since it might be sentiment and sentiment might reverse quickly. very low prices are also risky since it might never recover. how does the specialist stay afloat?I learned from the answer. There may be bits that are wrong. I'm sure there are bits that I misunderstand, but this is a good thing to learn from. I may come back and change those lists into actual lists. I'll leave them as-is for now.
===>